Apple factory's answer to worker suicides, replace staff with 1 million robots

Apple factory's answer to worker suicides, replace staff with 1 million robots
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2021251/Foxconn-Apple-factorys-answer-worker-suicides-replace-staff-1m-robots.html

Wired 8.04: Why the future doesn't need us. (Bill Joy, cofounder and Chief Scientist of Sun Microsystems)
Our most powerful 21st-century technologies - robotics, genetic engineering, and nanotech - are threatening to make humans an endangered species.
From the moment I became involved in the creation of new technologies, their ethical dimensions have concerned me, but it was only in the autumn of 1998 that I became anxiously aware of how great are the dangers facing us in the 21st century. I can date the onset of my unease to the day I met Ray Kurzweil, the deservedly famous inventor of the first reading machine for the blind and many other amazing things.
Ray and I were both speakers at George Gilder's Telecosm conference, and I encountered him by chance in the bar of the hotel after both our sessions were over. I was sitting with John Searle, a Berkeley philosopher who studies consciousness. While we were talking, Ray approached and a conversation began, the subject of which haunts me to this day.
I had missed Ray's talk and the subsequent panel that Ray and John had been on, and they now picked right up where they'd left off, with Ray saying that the rate of improvement of technology was going to accelerate and that we were going to become robots or fuse with robots or something like that, and John countering that this couldn't happen, because the robots couldn't be conscious.
While I had heard such talk before, I had always felt sentient robots were in the realm of science fiction. But now, from someone I respected, I was hearing a strong argument that they were a near-term possibility. I was taken aback, especially given Ray's proven ability to imagine and create the future. I already knew that new technologies like genetic engineering and nanotechnology were giving us the power to remake the world, but a realistic and imminent scenario for intelligent robots surprised me.
It's easy to get jaded about such breakthroughs. We hear in the news almost every day of some kind of technological or scientific advance. Yet this was no ordinary prediction. In the hotel bar, Ray gave me a partial preprint of his then-forthcoming book The Age of Spiritual Machines, which outlined a utopia he foresaw - one in which humans gained near immortality by becoming one with robotic technology. On reading it, my sense of unease only intensified; I felt sure he had to be understating the dangers, understating the probability of a bad outcome along this path.
I found myself most troubled by a passage detailing adystopian scenario:
THE NEW LUDDITE CHALLENGE
First let us postulate that the computer scientists succeed in developing intelligent machines that can do all things better than human beings can do them. In that case presumably all work will be done by vast, highly organized systems of machines and no human effort will be necessary. Either of two cases might occur. The machines might be permitted to make all of their own decisions without human oversight, or else human control over the machines might be retained.
If the machines are permitted to make all their own decisions, we can't make any conjectures as to the results, because it is impossible to guess how such machines might behave. We only point out that the fate of the human race would be at the mercy of the machines. It might be argued that the human race would never be foolish enough to hand over all the power to the machines. But we are suggesting neither that the human race would voluntarily turn power over to the machines nor that the machines would willfully seize power. What we do suggest is that the human race might easily permit itself to drift into a position of such dependence on the machines that it would have no practical choice but to accept all of the machines' decisions. As society and the problems that face it become more and more complex and machines become more and more intelligent, people will let machines make more of their decisions for them, simply because machine-made decisions will bring better results than man-made ones. Eventually a stage may be reached at which the decisions necessary to keep the system running will be so complex that human beings will be incapable of making them intelligently. At that stage the machines will be in effective control. People won't be able to just turn the machines off, because they will be so dependent on them that turning them off would amount to suicide.
On the other hand it is possible that human control over the machines may be retained. In that case the average man may have control over certain private machines of his own, such as his car or his personal computer, but control over large systems of machines will be in the hands of a tiny elite - just as it is today, but with two differences. Due to improved techniques the elite will have greater control over the masses; and because human work will no longer be necessary the masses will be superfluous, a useless burden on the system. If the elite is ruthless they may simply decide to exterminate the mass of humanity. If they are humane they may use propaganda or other psychological or biological techniques to reduce the birth rate until the mass of humanity becomes extinct, leaving the world to the elite. Or, if the elite consists of soft-hearted liberals, they may decide to play the role of good shepherds to the rest of the human race. They will see to it that everyone's physical needs are satisfied, that all children are raised under psychologically hygienic conditions, that everyone has a wholesome hobby to keep him busy, and that anyone who may become dissatisfied undergoes "treatment" to cure his "problem." Of course, life will be so purposeless that people will have to be biologically or psychologically engineered either to remove their need for the power process or make them "sublimate" their drive for power into some harmless hobby. These engineered human beings may be happy in such a society, but they will most certainly not be free. They will have been reduced to the status of domestic animals.1
[continued …]
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html

Mohawk: Flash Forward In Reverse Fashion (Pattern Analysis)

Quetzalcoatl - The Feathered Serpent::
http://forthtell.blogspot.com/2012/06/apl-plm-mer-chants-of-old-world-order_7300.html

Is Ron Paul a Freemason? And if so, why is Alex Jones promoting him?

Google, “Ron Paul Masonic handshake” and you will see one.

You’ll also see Ron Paul throwin’ devils horns.

That leads me to my next question.

What is the provenance of this photo?

What is going on?

Has this been photoshopped?

Or is it legit?

I did a search on www.tinyeye.com, and didn’t come up with anything.

http://www.tineye.com/search/679681fed59362fdd48bec64acf93103d0a21976/

Today, Tuesday, (July 19^th, 2011), Alex Jones said, his research on Ron Paul, was that Ron Paul isn’t a Mason.

(Listen to the final few minutes of the transmission and into the fourth hour of overdrive.)

Background:

http://www.infowars.com/articles/nwo/bush_inauguration_illuminati_hand_sign.htm

http://www.infowars.com/michelle-obama-flashes-%E2%80%98el-diablo%E2%80%99-hand-signal-on-cover-of-vogue/

http://www.infowars.com/video/clips/occult/pat_robertson_diablo.htm

http://www.infowars.com/print/Secret_societies/worldleaders.htm

http://www.infowars.com/glenn-beck-dons-freemasonic-patch-during-broadcast/

Interesting:

http://www.dailypaul.com/46310/freemasonry-is-evil

Google is a number

007

SPY

NSA

INQTEL

GOOGOL

10^100

GOOGLE

6OO6L6

600676

666-007

007:

John Dee (13 July 1527 – 1608 or 1609) was a noted English mathematician, astronomer, astrologer, occultist, navigator, imperialist,[4] and consultant to Queen Elizabeth I. He devoted much of his life to the study of alchemy, divination, and Hermetic philosophy. Dee straddled the worlds of science and magic just as they were becoming distinguishable. One of the most learned men of his age [.]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dee

“Dee signed his letters with two circles symbolising his own two eyes and indicating that he was the secret eyes of the Queen.  The two circles are guarded by what may be considered a square root sign or an elongated seven. For Dee, seven was a sacred cabbalistic and lucky number.(Richard Deacon)

http://www.sirbacon.org/links/dblohseven.html

007 (history):

Secret Mysteries of America's Beginnings Volume 1: The New Atlantis (Video 2006)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0814308/

SPY:

"Although not completely recognised in Britain, on the continent it was believed Dee was an official spy for Elizabeth I. Indeed, there are many references to Dee having passed Walsingham intelligence on a regular occurrence.

http://www.johndee.co.uk/

NSA:

www.nsa.gov/

INQTEL:

http://www.iqt.org/

Don’t Be Evil? 10 Ways In Which Google Runs The World (February 18, 2011)

#1 – Google has intimate and long standing connections to government spy networks.

The company has established a close working relationship with the National Security Agency, [...]

Google Ventures, the investment arm of Google, has injected a sum of up to $10 million, as has In-Q-Tel – which handles investments for the CIA and the wider intelligence network – into a company called Recorded Future.

http://www.infowars.com/dont-be-evil-10-ways-in-which-google-runs-the-world/

GOOGOL:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googol

10^100:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googol

GOOGLE:

Founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin named the search engine they built “Google,” a play on the word “googol,” the mathematical term for a 1 followed by 100 zeros. The name reflects the immense volume of information that exists, and the scope of Google’s mission: to organise the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.

http://www.google.com/intl/en/corporate/

6OO6L6

600676

666-007

The prevalence of 666 in corporate logos is ubiquitous.

Part 1: MK Ultra:
http://forthtell.blogspot.com/2011/03/mk-ultra.html

Moon (phase shited to odd angle)

Teaching the Machine...

We are Organic Internet.

Fox Screws

Please read through the various paragraphs as one composite thought (the links are for sourcing and more insight after you read through once).

Definition of "fox" (http://www.Merriam-Webster.com/dictionary/fox):


fox (noun), often attributive \ˈfäks\
Definition of FOX
1a : any of various carnivorous mammals (especially genus Vulpes) of the dog family related to but smaller than wolves with shorter legs, more pointed muzzle, large erect ears, and long bushy tail b : the fur of a fox

2: a clever crafty person

3archaic : sword


Examples of FOX
He's a wily old fox.
<she's a real fox—smart, sassy, and sexy>

Origin of FOX
Middle English, from Old English; akin to Old High German fuhs fox and perhaps to Sanskrit puccha tail
transitive verb
1 obsolete : intoxicate

2a : to trick by ingenuity or cunning : outwit b : baffle <foxed by his behavior>
Examples of FOX
They foxed me into telling the secret.
The problem had us foxed!

First Known Use of FOX 1611
Synonyms: addle, baffle, bamboozle, beat, befog, befuddle, bemuse, bewilder, buffalo, confound, discombobulate, disorient, flummox, confuse, fuddle, get, gravel, maze, muddle, muddy, mystify, perplex, pose, puzzle, vex
Now Muckey Map "Rupert Murdoch":http://www.muckety.com/K-Rupert-Murdoch/906.muckety?big=true


Take note of the link (off to the left) Matthew Freud.
(Read that great grandson of Sigmund Freud.)


Refresher:
Sigmund Freud was an Austrian neurologist who founded the discipline of psychoanalysis. Freud is best known for his theories of the unconscious mind and the mechanism of repression, and for creating the clinical method of psychoanalysis for investigating the mind and treating psychopathology through dialogue between a patient (or "analysand") and a psychoanalyst. Freud established sexual drives as the primary motivational forces of human life, developed therapeutic techniques such as the use of free association, discovered the phenomenon of transference in the therapeutic relationship and established its central role in the analytic process; he interpreted dreams as sources of insight into unconscious desires. He was an early neurological researcher into cerebral palsy, aphasia and microscopic neuroanatomy, and a prolific essayist, drawing on psychoanalysis to contribute to the history, interpretation and critique of culture. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigmund_Freud


Ever hear of Edward Bernay, (by the way, he's Freud's nephew)? ...
Wiki: Bernays' public relations efforts helped to popularize Freud's theories in the United States. Bernays also pioneered the PR industry's use of psychology and other social sciences to design its public persuasion campaigns:
"If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, is it not possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing about it? The recent practice of propaganda has proved that it is possible, at least up to a certain point and within certain limits."[5]
He called this scientific technique of opinion-molding the 'engineering of consent'.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays


‘Engineering of consent’ sounds kinda foxy ...


Propaganda: manipulation of public opinion:
In Propaganda (1928), Bernays argued that the manipulation of public opinion was a necessary part of democracy:
The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ...We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. ...In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons...who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays


foxier yet ...


The Freud – Murdoch family ties …
BBC News | SHOWBIZ | Murdoch and Freud [Grandson of Sigmond Freud] wed
[Freud owns Freud Communications, one of the UK's largest and most powerful PR companies.]
Media mogul Elisabeth Murdoch and PR boss Matthew Freud marry in what was billed as the media wedding of the year.
www.news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/1496141.stm


Change Behavior Through ‘Propaganda Placement’:
“Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation is to push climate change propaganda through it's programming and media output in an effort to cause people to change their behavior and become more green.
At an event held this morning in midtown Manhattan and webcast to all News Corp. employees, Murdoch vowed to "weave climate messaging into the content and programming of News Corp.'s many holdings."
"The challenge is to revolutionize the [climate change] message," Murdoch told the crowd. He emphasized the need to "make it dramatic, make it vivid, even sometimes make it fun. We want to inspire people to change their behavior."
http://www.infowars.net/articles/may2007/110507Murdoch.htm


The 1010 Project:
Watch this video to understand the mindset of those who are giving us the Carbon Tax, Green Movement:
The 10:10 movement: all skeptical kids and adults will be [murdered by ] detonat[ion] on 10/10 …
http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-1010-movement-all-skeptical-kids-and-adults-will-be-detonated-on-1010.html


On the 1010 project ...
"When you go into the guy who wrote it [the above video; T.V. commercial], the guy that they chose to write it, his name is Richard Curtis.  He's the writer and director of Four Weddings and a Funeral, this is high, pro stuff, very expensive movies, Knotting Hill, and Bridgett Jones' Diary.  His partner, now listen to this, is Emma Freud.  Oh, my goodness, what a small world, great grand-daughter of Sigmund Freud, sister of Matthew Freud, whose wife is Elizabeth Murdoch, daughter of Rupert Murdoch, you know the big media mogul.  See how they're all tied in giving you your reality.  And here they are brainwashing the schools for the children to be little fanatics, where they laugh at people getting blown up, who are climate change deniers.  Matthew Freud is head of Freud Communications, an international public relations firm, just like Bernays, you see, because Bernays was the nephew of Freud.  It's all in the family, isn't it?  And you wonder where your thoughts and ideas all come from.  These guys are brainwashing your children, across the planet.  And you don't have a clue what's really going on.  Most of them don't know. “
http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/transcripts/Alan_Watt_CTTM_LIVEonRBN_676_Movie_No_Pressure_Kills_at_Leisure_Oct012010.html


“Engineering of consent” …


On mass manipulation:
Between Two Ages by Zbigniew Brzezinski (1970):
"Speaking of a future at most only decades away, an experimenter in intelligence control asserted, “I foresee a time when we shall have the means and therefore, inevitably, the temptation to manipulate the behavior and intellectual functioning of all the people through environmental and biochemical manipulation of the brain." p15
http://infowars.wikia.com/wiki/Between_Two_Ages


Operation Mockingbird was a secret Central Intelligence Agency campaign to influence domestic and foreign media beginning in the 1950s.
The activities, extent and even the existence of the CIA project remain in dispute: the operation was first called Mockingbird in Deborah Davis' 1979 book, Katharine the Great: Katharine Graham and her Washington Post Empire. But Davis' book, alleging that the media had been recruited (and infiltrated) by the CIA for propaganda purposes, was itself controversial and has since been shown to have had a number of erroneous assertions.[1] More evidence of Mockingbird's existence emerged in the 2007 memoir American Spy: My Secret History in the CIA, Watergate and Beyond, by convicted Watergate "plumber" E. Howard Hunt and The Mighty Wurlitzer: How the CIA Played America by Hugh Wilford (2008).[2]
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird?wasRedirected=true


The Freud-Murdoch family ties are eerily familiar ...
The social practice of interbreeding of the elite families (the Darwins and the Wedgewoods, progenitors and believers in eugenics and the worldview most people subscribe to today – evolution, which removes God from the equation, and allows for the State to reign supreme, dictating which rights we are entitled to.  A brilliant tool used to overthrow the masses.)
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/04/science/04darwin.html
http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/transcripts/Alan_Watt_CTTM_LIVEonRBN_86_Dabbling_Darwin_and_the_Old_Boys_New_World_Order_Mar102008.html


fox
screws
ewes
lose
views
spews